🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – seems like it requires a PhD in healthcare.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Expensive

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning because partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How medical professionals receive payment would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee making average wages must contribute approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you compare that with what average US resident spends. I can name multiple clients who are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. This includes both worker and employer contribution. And, like many our government's military, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and fruitless) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of American employees and generate half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a better and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot amid current situation could be that we take serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.